Saturday, October 11, 2008

Phase Two

After surveying my students to find out what they thought about men and women, I began to observe four of my boys. I chose these boys because they exhibited what I believed to be masculine tendencies and they had the most problems in and outside of the classroom. Jay is from a two parent home and is the oldest of four. He is ten years old and big for his age. His father is a welder and his mother works for the local hospital. Jay has commented that his father told him not to allow anyone to mess with him and if someone does, take care of it. Jay walks around the classroom making his presence know. He doesn't initiate conflict, but he doesn't back down either. He often intimidates by invading other people's space. When he doesn't want to do what I ask, he looks at me and turns his head and says, "I don't want to." When I respond, he ignores me until I say, "Do I need to call your Dad?" Once I have asked the question, he becomes grudgingly compliant. According to my research, Jay's behavior is a exhibition of hegemonic masculinity. Hegemonic masculinity is masculinity that is socially expected , accepted and supported by society. In our culture the some of the characteristics that are linked to hegemonic masculinity are defiance, aggressiveness, strength, macho ism and self-reliance. Nate is a boy who has been in the foster system because his mom is in jail. He is quiet, but does not tolerate anyone messing with him or his friends. He is often defiant and rebellious toward my direction. He often states that he doesn't need anyone or anything and that he can take care of himself. He now lives with family members and tries hard to please them. When I mention contacting them he silently cries, but he stands up straight and tall and looks me dead in the eyes. It is as if he's saying I can handle whatever you're dishing out. His behavior is also characteristic of hegemonic masculinity. I'll talk about the final two in the next post.

4 comments:

Shawna said...

Fascinating, absolutely fascinating. You describe your students so exactly, their body language and their background, so that I feel I am in your classroom. I feel for these boys. It's obvious you have done your research and are linking it to the behaviors you observe. That's almost a project unto itself. I wish I had you in my class last year when I had three third grade boys who actively disrupted the classroom. Are you going to do ethnographic descriptions/case studies of your students? You've got the knack for it.

MFord said...

Yes, I will be using ethnographic descriptions/case studies in my project. I will also use surveys and discipline records.

teacherpreacher said...

Several years ago, my friend gave me a book called something like,
Why Gender Matters.
There were a few chapters which made me physically ill because it went into some very specific sexual activity of teenagers, but aside from that, I found it fascinating.
My point is: Have you been reading literature on studies done on the achievement patterns at all-boy and all-girl schools?
Right now, I am having trouble in my class because there is a boy with a crush on a girl. He has rallied his friends, a couple of times, to try and "take out" the boy who sits next to "his girl" (who does not even know he exists) and in so doing, talks to her.
I wonder if this aggressive distracting behavior would be null and void if there were not girls at his school?
You know?
I am sure there would still be trouble ( ooh was that a generalization?). But, a lot of trouble which occurs during the "SPRING FEVER" epidemic each March and April is because of boys liking girls and girls liking boys.
I know my daughter goes to school for ONE thing...boys. She did not talk about academics at all for the first month of school. She was concerned there were not any good looking guys on campus.
Yikes.
Her cousin's parents send her to a private all-girl Catholic school. She is boy-crazy too, but at least she focuses on it after school hours. :0)

MFord said...

You bring up a good point. the problem is that we live in a society where boys and girls co-mingle on a daily basis. I think that one of the ways to diffuse the sexual tension between girls and boys is to allow homogeneous grouping at different times during daily classroom activities. I am not sure that I would suggest homogeneous classes. I believe that both groups have something to offer in the classroom.